Fujifilm XF 23mm f2 vs 23mm f1.4
In this blog I will compare the Fujifilm 23mm f1.4 with the smaller f2 version. Although I think these are two totally different products aimed at different use cases, many people would have to choose one and I hope this blog can help you decide. For reference I’ve owned the 23f2 since 2019 while the f1.4 version was a recent edition earlier this year and has been used extensively on my Japan trip.
I’ve already written separate reviews for both of these lenses that you can find by clicking the links below:
Common Strengths
Both of these have a solid metal build, feel high quality and come with weather sealing. Both come with aperture dials that are clearly marked and well damped. Although there is a size and weight difference, both are still compact and lightweight. Equally although there is a substantial difference in image quality, both will produce a good image with great colours and contrast.
Common Weaknesses
Not many weaknesses to be honest. If i was to nitpick, I would say the paint finish is a little on the thin side and it will wear off even with normal use. It also means both of these lenses scratch easily.
23mm f2 > 23mm f1.4
There are only two key point that would make you pick the f2 version over the f1.4. The first is the size difference is substantial with the f2 being pocketable while the f1.4 version is nearly twice the size and weight. If you’re going to be doing a lot of travelling, want to pack light or not carry too much on you when you’re out shooting, then the f2 is the clear winner. The f2 is also cheaper so if you’re on a budget, then the f2 will save you a fair bit.
23mm f1.4 > 23mm f2
There are three key points that will make you pick the f1.4 over the f2. The first and most obvious one is the wider aperture meaning shooting in low light environments becomes much easier. Also this gives you more creative options regarding depth of field. The second glaring difference is image quality. Even without needing to zoom in, the f1.4 is clearly sharper, cleaner and has better contrast. The f2 seems soft and a little hazy in comparison. After shooting on the f1.4 for a few months and going back to the f2, I had to double check if I was actually in focus. Of course if you stop down to f8 and not pay attention to fine details, then the gap shrinks a little. The final big difference is the focusing system with the f1.4 version having the better LM focus motor meaning tracking and video performance is noticeably improved. The final minor difference is the f1.4 has a lock on the aperture dial for locking it A (auto / command dial control).
Summary
Although they share the same focal length, these lenses are aimed at different users. The f2 is more suited to hobbyists or those frequently travelling. Equally the f2 is the better choice if you don’t shoot in low light nor care about the best image quality. The f1.4 is aimed at a more professional user who needs the best image, AF and low light performance. I’d say for most people the f2 is gonna be more than good enough and those who need the f1.4, already know they need it.
If you found this blog helpful and wish to learn more about photography & travel while having direct access to me, please consider joining my Patreon community.
If you’re considering purchasing this item and use the affiliate links below, it will not cost you any extra however I will get a small % kickback which helps keep this blog ad free for you to enjoy.
Purchase here:
