Fujifilm 50mm f2 vs 56mm f1.2 WR
If you’re in the market for a 50mm Fuji prime, you have two options. The 50mm f2 and 56mm f1.2. Of course there’re other third party primes but this comparison is for the two Fujifilm options. These two lenses might seem similar but they are chalk and cheese in terms of the user experience. This comparison will be from a more holistic perspective and we will not be getting into technical specifics. For a more detailed review on each lens please see their respective blogs below:
Similarities
The first and main similarity is a high quality build with weather sealing. Both these lenses feel premium and well made. With that said both of them seem to have a somewhat thin paint finish which can result is small scratches here and there. However this is nothing to worry about, more of an observation than a complaint. Both lenses have great image quality and although there are different characteristics to the image, both look fantastic at any aperture value and can resolve higher resolutions. This is where the similarities end.
Differences
Let’s start with the most obvious difference and that’s ergonomics. The f1.2 is considerably bigger and heavier than the f2. While the f2 is pocketable and is great on any body, the f1.2 only feels comfortable with the bigger XH bodies. On anything smaller, the 56 feels front heavy and uncomfortable. This alone can be a deciding factor for many buyers. The second biggest difference is the autofocus performance. The f2 is quicker, quieter, smoother and more reliable while the f1.2 is loud, clunky, slow and lethargic. The two lenses feel like they are from different generations even though technically the 56mm was released after the 50. If the size wasn’t an issue, then this could be a deciding factor for many because the difference is night and day. The third biggest difference is the maximum aperture however this is obvious. Finally although both lenses have great image quality, the 56mm looks much better especially at apertures of f2.8 and below. It’s softer with more pleasing contrast and overall rendering. At f1.2 it can look magical and no wonder it has a cult like following despite the size and autofocus constraints.
Why pick the f1.2
If you do portraits, product photography or mostly work in a studio environment then the 56 will be great because the slower autofocus and size will not be an issue. If you find yourself mostly shooting at night and need the most light gathering capability, then the 56 will give you that. If you shoot mainly slow or static scenes, work slowly and don’t need to track fast moving subjects, this AF system will be adequate. Finally if you like the specific look that the 56 produces, then there isn’t any other choice.
Why pick the f2
If you travel, hike or do street photography then the size and weight advantage of the 50mm will be clear. This lens is designed to go with you anywhere you go without holding you back or adding unnecessary bulk. If you like to use smaller bodies like the XE or XT30/50, then this lens will fit that like a glove. If most of your photography is during daytime or you rarely go below f2, you do not need a faster prime. Even in low light, f2 can be sufficient assuming that you’re ok with a little more noise to clean up or you’re shooting in bright areas like a big city centre. If you need quiet and fast autofocus especially if moving subjects are involved, then the 50 is the clear winner. Finally if you want to save a few hundred $ to spend on a trip, I would suggest the 50.
Summary
To summarise the 50mm f2 is a better choice for 90% of people. The 56mm f1.2 is a niche product for a small % of photographers. With that said both lenses can get the job done if in the right hands and ultimately it comes down to your needs and budget.
If you’re considering purchasing this item and use the affiliate links below, it will not cost you any extra however I will get a small % kickback which helps keep this blog ad free for you to enjoy.
Purchase here:
